Campaigns Form in Fight over 'Life-Altering' Election
YES to Ferndale's Future is voting 'yes' and Ferndale Against Council's Tax is voting 'no.'
There's a fight brewing in Ferndale. No, it's not a fistfight. It's not a physical altercation at all. Some say it's a fight for Ferndale's future, a fight to preserve services and a quality of life Ferndalians have come to expect. Others might say it's a fight to keep their homes, to cut to the bone, to tighten the belts.
Two campaigns have formed on opposite sides of the Headlee Override millage vote on May 3. YES to Ferndale's Future, is campaigning for a "yes" vote, and Ferndale Against Council's Tax, or F.A.C.T., is pushing for a "no."
"This is probably the most pivotal election in Ferndale in the last 10 years," said Dennis Whittie, co-chairman for YES to Ferndale's Future, River Rouge police officer and longtime Ferndale resident.
Ferndale is facing a projected $2.3 million shortfall for FYE 2012 and an additional $3.4 million for FYE 2013. In order to fill this gap, the Headlee Override was recommended by a Council-appointed, 12-member Financial Planning Committee that met for 14 weeks, from September to January. Whittie was a member of this committee.
The committee comprised residents from each precinct, plus one nonresident from the business community. After its research, it unanimously backed the Headlee Override as the only option the city had to close the shortfall and preserve a similar quality of life.
The Headlee Override would raise the city's general operating tax 3 mills for the first year, or about 6 percent on a resident's total property tax bill, and 2.45 mills for the next four, or about 5 percent on a total tax bill. The millage would end on May 31, 2015. The revenue generated would go into the city's general fund.
The average tax bill in Ferndale for 2010-11 was $2,112 at the average taxable value of about $44,000, according to the 2010 Oakland County Equalization Report. This would be about $132 increase the first year and an additional $239 increase for the next.
This millage would be a stopgap measure but would allow the city to perform the services near what they are now, Ferndale Interim City Manager Mark Wollenweber said. If the millage fails, the city will have to look at cutting 20 to 24 more employees, on top of the 40 laid off from last summer, when the city had to balance a more than $3 million shortfall.
"This is a life alerting election," Whittie said. "(With a no vote), we won't see the results this year, maybe not in 2012, but by 2013, Ferndale could be a different city."
F.A.C.T. Is Voting No
For members of F.A.C.T., it's an issue of the tax increase. Co-chair of F.A.C.T., Sean House, said the main reason the group is against the Headlee Override is that Ferndale already has one of the highest tax rates in the county.
Ferndale's current tax rate is 48 mills, behind Lathrup Village's 55 mills, Madison Heights (Lamphere school district) at 53, and the Southfield (Southfield school district) at about 52, according to the Oakland County 2010 Equalization Report.
| City, Village, Township | School District | Average TV per Single Family | Tax Rate 2010/11 | Average Tax Bill |
| Hazel Park | Hazel Park | $29,007 | 46.7779 | $1,357 |
| Oak Park | Berkley | $43,056 | 45.0253 | $1,939 |
| Oak Park | Ferndale | $43,056 | 47.8086 | $2,058 |
| Oak Park | Oak Park | $43,056 | 48.0086 | $2,067 |
| Ferndale | Ferndale and Hazel Park | $43,941 | 48.0584 | $2,112 |
| Royal Oak | Berkley | $70,239 | 32.2193 | $2,263 |
| Madison Heights | Lamphere | $44,019 | 53.1034 | $2,338 |
| Royal Oak | Clawson | $70,239 | 34.1026 | $2,395 |
| Royal Oak | Royal Oak | $70,239 | 35.7338 | $2,510 |
| Southfield | Southfield | $50,827 | 51.9191 | $2,639 |
| Lathrup Village | Southfield | $59,059 | 55.1618 | $3,258 |
| Pleasant Ridge | Ferndale | $93,260 | 41.4823 | $3,869 |
| Huntington Woods | Royal Oak | $120,386 | 47.5802 | $5,728 |
| Bingham Farms, Village | Southfield | $188,789 | 42.9763 | $8,113 |
Source: 2010 Oakland County Equalization Report
The overall 11 percent increase in property taxes if the Headlee Override passes is too much, say proponents of F.A.C.T.
"We pay a lot of taxes as a business and property owner and I want to fight to keep those taxes low," said F.A.C.T. co-chairman Dave Leonard, who owns Grand Central Self Storage in Ferndale. Leonard is a Bloomfield Township resident. "I feel the city hasn't done enough in cutting expenses."
House said that F.A.C.T. has formed its own committee that will meet for 14 weeks, just as the Financial Planning Committee did, and will present options that don't require a tax increase. This plan, House said, will be released on April 18, two weeks before the election.
"We want to look at the whole budget, not just the general fund," House said. Council charged its Financial Planning Committee to look only at the general fund, which is where the $2.3 million shortfall is coming from.
"I don't think personnel cuts have to be made," House said. "Going back 20 years ago, Ferndale still looked good. We can do little cuts here, little there, clean out city government."
House said specifics on what could or should be cut would be released when F.A.C.T. presents its April 18 budget plan, but he did discusse making the Downtown Development Authority and parks and recreation "self-sufficient." He said that there could be "structural changes" to government beyond the reorganization of City Hall that could close the gap as well.
"We're throwing more money at a problem … We don't need more money in Ferndale, we need to look at it the proper way, especially in these economic times," he said.
YES to Ferndale's Future is voting Yes
For YES to Ferndale's Future, voting yes on May 3 means preserving not only what Ferndale is, but what Ferndale can continue to be.
"If we didn't have such great services, I wouldn't be fighting to preserve them," co-chairman and Financial Planning Committee member Greg Pawlica said. "We risk losing that quality, we risk losing those services."
(To get an idea of what city government might look like with 15 percent to 20 percent cuts click here.)
Pawlica and Whittie both said that that without raising taxes to cover the shortfall, Ferndale would have to cut to the bone, which also would mean cutting police and fire, which make up 60 percent of the general fund.
"We spent over 1,000 hours going through the information out there to make a good decision on Ferndale's future, and it's in danger," Whittie said. "A no vote is going to cost the city its future."
Pawlica said that if the Headlee Override doesn't pass, Ferndale will see big cuts in parks and recreation, the Gerry Kulick Community Center would most likely close and grass wouldn't get cut in Ferndale, which would likely lower property values further.
"Within three years, 50 percent of the city staff would be cut, advance life support would be cut. We would have to contract EMS out, and that's not immediate to our city," Whittie said. "Private EMS units are glorified taxis. They are for profit, not for community."
Pawlica added: "Sometimes the truth is scary. It's not a scare tactic, it's reality."
Whittie said the most important thing a resident can do is look at his or her own situation. He said in some cases, even with the millage passing, residents might actually pay less because of the decline in housing values. Whittie said residents can contact him through the YES to Ferndale's Future website and he'll do the calculations to figure out how the millage will affect their property taxes.
"It really comes down to what services you value and what you're willing to pay for," he said.
Dates to remember
- April 11 (5:30-7:30 p.m.): There will be a Headlee Override presentation at the Ferndale public library organized by the Ferndale Area Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Development Authority for business owners in Ferndale to understand what the millage, passing or not, would mean to the city. Council will present overview scenarios for the millage passing and failing. Oakland County Assessor's Office will also discuss how Commercial Real Estate is assessed as well as the recent and predicted trends for property values in Oakland County. Finally, both millage campaigns, YES to Ferndale's Future and F.A.C.T. will present for five minutes each.
- April 23: Citizens for a fair Ferndale has organized a public forum for the Headlee Override at the library. Both campaigns, YES to Ferndale's Future and F.A.C.T., will be on hand to discuss its position and take questions from the audience. Starts at 2 p.m.
- May 3: Ferndale residents go to the polls to vote for the Headlee Override millage increase. A yes vote will increase the city's operating rate 3 mills, or about 6 percent, for the first year and 2.45, or about 5 percent, for the next four years. The Headlee Override, if passed, would sunset on Dec. 31, 2015.
- F.A.C.T. is having several Town Hall meetings; click here for dates, times and locations.
Matt Nowaczok
10:21 am on Monday, April 11, 2011
No specifics about how to fix the budget just more empty rhetoric from Mr. House. Also, just an fyi for readers - Mr. House is lying about F.A.C.T.'s 14 week committee. Per the paperwork filed with the Oakland County Clerk (http://courts.oakgov.com/cfrs/iCommitteePortal.php?iCommitteeID=11241) F.A.C.T. was formed on 2/1/11. The math does not work on the "14 week" claim by Mr. House given his 4/18 self-imposed deadline. It appears he may have issues with his math...might explain why he can't see the looming fiscal deficit if people do not vote YES on May 3rd.
Terry Parris Jr.
10:43 am on Monday, April 11, 2011
Just for continuity (I posted this on your Facebook comment as well): FYI: Sean said his group had started meeting in late December, before F.A.C.T. was official.
Jacki Smith
12:11 pm on Monday, April 11, 2011
The finance committee that the City appointed is of public record, who is on the F.A.C.T. finance committee?
Terry Parris Jr.
12:26 pm on Monday, April 11, 2011
Jacki: I have asked Sean House for a list of core members and their residencies. When I receive it, I'll publish. Unless someone gets it before I do, in which case, please pass it along.
This is who I know is on the committe:
Justin Mordarski -- Taylor
Mary K. Frederick -- Ferndale
Alan Soave -- Ferndale
Dave Leonard -- co-chair, Bloomfield Resident, Business owner -- Grand Central Self Storage
Sean House -- c0-chair, Ferndale
Michael Lang
9:22 am on Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Not intending to slam either side of this issue but I understand the use of "average" in computing annual homeowner cost, but what about those of us that fall way above that "average" being presented?? I am all for Ferndale moving forward to preserve services we currently have and do not want to see anyone lose their job due to cuts however if I really cannot afford a tax increase due to cuts in my income and market conditions as they unfortunately are, how am I to vote yes for this?? I have to be obidiant with my finances before I agree to pay out what I may not have when it comes time. Sorry, I really wish things were different.
T. Scott Galloway
10:36 am on Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Michael - the best way for you to make an informed decision is to calculate what it means for you personally - take the taxable value of your property, divide by 1000 and multiply by 17.533 (the current millage rate of 14.533 + the Headlee override amount of 3.00). That is the amount you would pay for City taxes this July if the override passes. Compare that number to what you paid in 2008 and you might be surprised by the numbers. You can do these calculations at the link below and also see historical information on your taxes and everyone else's taxes in the city.
https://is.bsasoftware.com/bsa.is/default.aspx
For many people the increase will represent less than a $1 a day, put their total tax obligation at an amount still less than what they were paying in 2008, assure that police and fire response times remain in the 120 second range and keep your insurance premiums where they are by preserving our ISO rating.
T. Scott Galloway
10:38 am on Tuesday, April 12, 2011
As a point of clarification - you pay many other taxes on your July tax bill that do not go to the City of Ferndale or cannot be applied to city operations (e.g. debt service, intermediate school district, library, oakland county community college etc)
Michael Lang
4:00 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Thanks Mr. Galloway. I am a very experienced Realtor, CDPE (Certified Distressed Property Expert) and RFC (Residential Finance Consultant) and am very aware of the computations. Unfortunately we bought (new build) in peak market conditions (2000) when our tax base was much exagerated. I fully understand the need to preserve what we have as services for our community. My point is, and I know I am the minority in this situation, our taxes are getting more affordable at this point but with lower income on my part due to lower comissions and higher fees to operate in my buisness it is currently very hard to make due. I can honestly say for real that we personally cannot afford an increse even though we have had significant decreases in taxable values for the past two years. Unfortunately as much as I would like to vote "yes" financially I cannot. Maybe if we use that "average household cost" and implement the financial burden that way it would help. I do not see one household paying x dollars and another household paying xxx dollars for the same service as being fair at all. I, as a CDPE, counsel families on a daily basis that have or are about to loose their homes and it is a frightening experience. Please believe me when I tell you that these amounts, as little as they appear to some, are devasating to alot more households than you could imagine. In alot of cases it is the breaking point. You guys do an awsome job serving our city and I would love to talk more in these regards.
T. Scott Galloway
5:33 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Mr. Lang - of course everyone's situation is different - and you should certainly do what is in the best interest of you and your household. As an attorney whose practice concentrates on residential real estate I certainly can appreciate your situation. I have done the computations for the two properties that I own in Ferndale and, combined, the additional cost of a Headlee override to me from the current tax level is about $0.50 a day. That is a price I am willing and able to pay to keep our ISO rating from dropping and driving our insurance rates up. I believe that amount is a good investment for me to preserve our police force and hopefully our housing values. I know from looking at our budget numbers that our PD and FD will not be able to deliver the same level of services if we do not restore some of the tax revenue we have lost over the past two or three years. I believe that paying more in taxes will be more than offset by the savings I will realize from my insurance premiums not increasing and the value of my properties not dropping further. If people have educated themselves about our May 3 Headlee Override vote and make an informed decision not to vote for it, while I would disagree with their decision, I would completely respect their decision. I am glad you have taken the time to learn about the proposal and the impact of your decision. Unfortunately the opponents of the override are not presenting a factual or honest argument against the override.
Michael Lang
6:47 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Again Mr. Galloway, I do not feel good about what I may have to do at all. I wish it was different for me, I would love to be able to base it on $0.25 a day but unfortunate for myself that is not the case. I also understand that the opposition are not being completly factual or honest and I am not happy with them for acting in that manner nor do I support them. To be honest, I hope it does pass no matter what my vote ends up to be and hopefully when the time comes to pay I can afford it. I watch the city council meetings on cable and keep up with what is going on as best I can and support our PD and FD along with our city council to the fullest extent. I am in no way trying to persuade anyones vote in any way. For me it is just soul searching and being as honest as I can. I will continue to pray in these regards as we still have some time prior to vote. Thanks for taking the time to respond and please keep up the good work.
USMC6742
9:02 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Why does it always seem that Mr. Galloway (I refuse to call him a councilmen) seems to think that everyone is either down right dumb when it comes to this subject or does he think that, because he's a lawyer, we should all have the same superior intelligence that he seems to think he has. I crack up every time I watch the City Council meetings on TV and to watch the sarcastic crap that comes out of his mouth is, alone, pathetic and degrading to the citizens of Ferndale. I have to agree, as I had indicated before, with regards to Councilman Lennon. Read what's out there and make your own decision on what is best for your family. The current City Council isn't going to do one thing that some citizens have suggested. Get rid of the DDA. Get rid of the Parks and Recs., Why does Ferndale need to be the "Shinning Star" when it comes to the Woodward Dream Cruise? Do we really need a Street Sweeper from the DPW? Make all City Employees pay there own health insurance and pension funds. Stop all payments to the City Council including the Mayor. You choose to serve the public so do what you were elected to do and SERVE THE PUBLIC. Were does the city purchase there office supplies from? Did they ever hear of a Dollar Store? Oh not good enough so they go to Staples or Office Max and pay $10..00 for one pencil or pen when they could get 10 for a $1.00... Vote yes on this upcoming election and your giving the City Council an open Check book!
T. Scott Galloway
10:17 am on Thursday, April 14, 2011
Dream Cruise activities have no effect on the general fund budget and is entirely paid for by corporate sponsorships.
Street sweeper has no effect on general fund budget and if we didn't clean the streets as regularly as we do the replaced sewer lines that citizens approved and are still paying for would prematurely deteriorate.
Employee health care cannot be unilaterally changed by the city and must be bargained for with the unions. We have been working for over a decade to lower health care costs and have been remarkably successful.
All employees currently pay for their own pensions. The firefighters have a defined benefit pension plan which they bargained for in lieu of pay increases. All other employees have defined contribution pension plans and therefore do pay for themselves.
Office supplies represent an almost insignificant amount of our budget and with reduced staffing levels sending staff to the dollar store is inefficient.
Linda Baker
9:39 am on Sunday, April 17, 2011
Can't tell you how many times I have gone to a dollar store and seen things that I could buy elsewhere for 69cents! Ease of shopping is what you're paying for there...........perhaps group purchasing could be a solution to drop costs, either departmentally or multi citywise, although I imagine that has been thought of already.
I understand there is a portion of the vote no groups proposal that would have the city fire all full time city hall employees and replace them with part time employees so no benefits would have to be paid - that is really a wonderful way to treat the people that took a pay freeze/cut to keep their jobs and help the city out in hard times and besides..........remember that SOMETIMES you get what you pay for, I don't want people with no or little background in their field doing what has become a very multi skilled required job. Should the people they want fired train the part time replacements? I know I wouldn't be inclined to put myself out to support a commuity that had turned on me like that......is this Animal Farm? Should we fire all highly paid fire and police employees and hire cheaper inexperienced ones or do we value experience, perhaps a neighborhood watch group like they do in Detroit on Devils Night or just have a neighborhood bucket brigade when there is a fire would be cheaper as well - what about our isurance rates and agreements with neighboring communities on fire and police services, cheap is not always good.
Ardy
10:06 am on Sunday, April 17, 2011
The "suggestion" that all full time folks be replaced with part timers is just another unrealistic "solution" offered. I've seen the claim from this group that they have many suggestions and solutions but when you just get past the surface of these points they are completely unrealistic. It's very unfortunate that this group chose not to be part of the solution. They had their chance to contribute but punted instead. I've been hearing from council about budget challenges for at least the last 3 years, if not more. It is completely unacceptable and a waste of our time and money for this group to "rise up" now and start making demands and bully the fine seniors of this great City.